Yes. Company and branch are separate entities from the first screen, and each person has a role in the company they belong to. Stock, catalogue and invoicing are read per company — not filtered per company, which is what makes data from one branch leak into the report of another.
No, and it is a bad idea. The usual path is catalogue and stock first, because they are the ones that hurt daily, and invoicing after the first closing. We import what already exists in spreadsheets.
R$ 99 per store, per month, for whoever sells in one place — and there is an Integrated plan for whoever also sells on marketplaces or has more than one store. Number of users, size of the catalogue and volume of movements do not change the amount. Systems sold around here start at about R$ 250 and are built for companies that already have a finance department; this one is for the store that opened last year.
Honestly: in development. What exists today is the foundation — the data model for companies, stores, catalogue with fiscal fields, stock movements and the audit trail, plus the sign-in that already runs in production for the other products. What is being built now are the screens for daily use. Whoever enters the pilot list gets the order decided by their operation, and pays nothing until the system is doing real work for the store.
On our infrastructure, in Brazil, with an encrypted backup and a restore test — a backup nobody ever restored is not a backup. You can export everything, at any time, in an open format.
Export of your data is part of the product, not a favour granted on the way out. Whoever depends on lock-in to keep a client is admitting the product does not hold on its own.
Twenty minutes about your operation.
Tell us how many stores you have and what you use today. We show what exists, say what does not, and you decide.
